Elista, 29 September 2006
Open Letter
To
• FIDE President H.E. Kirsan Iljumshinov
Copied to
• Executive Committee of Kalmykia Mr. Valery Bovaev
• Chief Arbiter Mr. Geurt Gijssen
• Russian Chess Federation
Dear Mr. President,
The Appeals Committee of the World Championship Match between
Veselin Topalov and Vladimir Kramnik made the following decision
on the protest of the Topalov Team:
“to close both the toilets in the players rest rooms and to
open another toilet that will be available only to the two
players”
The Kramnik team received the mentioned decision a few hours
before the start of game 5 and was officially informed about the
protest of Mr. Topalov only yesterday evening, 10 p.m., 28
September 2006. With such a decision the WCC Committee is
clearly violating both the rules and regulations of the WCC
match and the rights of Mr. Kramnik.
The relevant clause in contract of Mr. Kramnik expels: “FIDE
shall provide a rest room and toilette for the players during
the WCC match in the playing hall and close to the stage (if
possible backstage) to be equipped with a live monitor furnished
with coffee and tea as well as with light refreshments.”
The reasons that Mr. Kramnik is entering his own bathroom
often is simple: The restroom is small and Mr. Kramnik likes to
walk and therefore uses the space of the bathroom as well. The
Appeals Committee has been informed about the issue before they
decided. It should also be mentioned that Mr. Kramnik has to
drink a lot of water during the games.
On the request of Mr. Topalov the agreed live monitors have
been removed as well as the shower cabines in the bath rooms.
The moves are provided on demonstration boards only. The
substance of Mr. Topalov protests (dated 22, 24 and 28 September
2006) were basically always met by the approval of the Appeals
Committee. Everything has been done here to satisfy Mr.
Topalov’s requests.
On a regulary basis the restrooms and toiletts are heavily
checked by specialists, obviously local police forces. This goes
together with the arrival of the players. The arbiters are
observing all the measures. One representative of each team has
the right of being present in order to observe the activities.
The playing area is banned from signals and the glas wall
protects from any kind of view contact and/or body language.
There is not a single reason or evidence to believe that a
player would have any kind of cheating possibilities.
It is and was no problem for the organization to assure all
necessary measures in order to avoid any kind of cheating. By
starting the match both participants agreed all the playing
conditions de facto and de jure and the conditions are therefore
legally binding. Any change of the playing conditions without a
good reason would in our understanding request the approval of
both players which is not the case here.
Mr. Kramnik believes that the latest decision should
increasingly concern the world of chess as it shows very clearly
and once again the biased stand of the Appeals Committee members
involved. In person: Mr. Makropolous, Mr. Azmaiparashivili (well
known as a close friend to Mr. Danailov), Mr. Gelfer (now
replaced by Mr. Vega). Therefore Mr. Kramnik requests to
exchange the mentioned persons immediately. Enough is enough.
We would like to add that the recent decision not only
insults Mr. Kramnik but is clearly critizing both the excellent
work of the local organisation at Elista and the nominated
arbiters. Yesterday evening the chief arbiter and the head of
the excutive committee once again confirmed that the indirect
accusations of cheating are nonsense.
The protests of the Topalov team into the direction of Mr.
Kramnik and the suspicions in the press release of Mr. Topalov
are utterly disgraceful and are touching Mr. Kramnik’s privacy.
We do not think that the Topalov team has any right of getting
access to the recordings. This shall be job of the nominated
arbiters only.
The Topalov team includes a parapsychologist and more people
which are obviously having no other tasks as to distract and to
insult Mr. Kramnik especially since their team is realizing that
Mr. Topalov finds himself in a difficult situation. This is what
we call an utterly unfair behaviour which is not in accordance
with the FIDE Code of Ethics. The decision taken by the Appeals
Committee can only be seen as another attempt to disturb Mr.
Kramniks concentration since it is difficult to understand what
kind of improvement it shall be to have one toilet instead of
two.
Our team does not trust the objectivity of the Appeals
Committee anymore. Therefore it makes no sense for us to bring a
protest to this table and Mr. Kramnik strongly insists once
again that the members of the Appeals Committee will be changed
immediately and that the heads of the Organizing Committee are
taking their responsibilities.
In the meanwhile Mr. Kramnik will stop playing this match as
long as FIDE is not ready to respect Mr. Kramnik’s rights, in
this case to use the toilet of his own restroom whenever he
wishes to do so.
Further and more detailed legal investigations are already in
process.
On behalf of Vladimir Kramnik
Yours sincerely,
Carsten Hensel
(Manager to Vladimir Kramnik, Classical World Chess Champion)
Related material
28-09-2006: Silvio Danailov, Topalov's manager, sent a letter
to the Appeal`s Committee of the World Chess Championship Match,
protesting against Kramnik's frequent visits to the toilet
during the games.
The text of this letter is published at this link
28-09-2006: The Appeal`s Committee, in an unprecedent
decision, complied to most requests from Danailov.
The full text of their decision can be read here
28-09-2006 Danailov's observations after the Appeal's
Committe decision.
Can be read here
29-09-2006: According to a
www.chessbase.com report, the start of the 5th game was delayed for 22
minutes, before the arbiter finally started the clocks. Kramnik was in the
playing hall, in his rest room, waiting for his toilet to be opened. At 17:00
the arbiter declared the forfeit in Topalov's favour.
While all of Danailov's letters have been published at FIDE's official
website, www.fide.com , the Kramnik's manager
letter has not.